evidence EV-AICODING-2026-3B8F
METR RCT found early-2025 AI slowed experienced maintainers
Evidence Record
Evidence summary
Sixteen experienced open-source developers completed 246 real issues in repositories they knew well. AI-allowed tasks took 19% longer, despite developers believing AI sped them up.
Exact claim supported or contradicted
AI availability does not guarantee speedup; developer perception can diverge from observed task time.
Source provenance
Primary study report and linked paper from an independent nonprofit.
Relevant excerpt or data
Developers expected 24% speedup; observed 19% slowdown; after the study they still estimated 20% speedup.
Interpretation
Repository familiarity, task realism, and verification overhead plausibly moderate effects.
Limitations
Only 16 developers, selected open-source projects, early-2025 tools, self- reported time, and uncertain generalization to other experience levels.
Counterevidence
EV-AICODING-2026-10A1 found a large speedup on a bounded greenfield task.
Reproduction or verification notes
The authors report estimator robustness but acknowledge representativeness risk. Later recruitment developed treatment-avoidance selection bias.